(I love that song!)
I was asked by Jane a while ago what I thought of the Tridentine Mass and whether I go to a Tridentine Mass.
Just before I write about that, for those who don't know the story..
At the Council of Trent in the mid-1500s, the style of the Mass was formalised; that is, the format, the words used, basically 'how-Mass-is-celebrated-in-the-Roman-Catholic-Church' was standardised officially.
And that style of Mass is called the Tridentine Mass.
The Tridentine Mass looks like this:

In the 1960s the Second Vatican Council, a new style of Mass was brought in. As I understand it, they wanted to make the Mass simpler; they got rid of the obligatory Latin and allowed Mass to be said in the local language ('the venacular'), the Priest faces the people, they changed the format of the readings and the entire liturgy, changed the obligatory position of the tabernacle, allowed Communion in the hand etc, amongst many other things.
This Mass we call the 'Novus Ordo" Mass, and that is the Mass which goes on in every Roman Catholic Church around the world (Eastern Rite Catholics have their own style of Mass).
This Mass can be said in any language; and some Churches have Latin Novus Ordo Mass (...but note that this is not the same as a Tridentine Mass).
(on a side-note: Eastern Rite Catholics are not the same as the Orthodox Church. The Orthodox broke away from the Catholic Church 1000yrs ago. The Eastern Rite Catholics are still part of the Catholic Church and are in communion with the Pope, but they celebrate the Sacraments in a different way. So all this discussion about Masses only pertains to the LATIN rite of the Catholic Church, and not the EASTERN rite who are in charge of their own liturgies).
As far as I understand it, in some circles there is a belief that the Tridentine Mass is..'better' (for want of a better word) that the Novus Ordo Mass. Some people see the Tridentine Mass as being more reverant and respectful, and the Novus Ordo Mass as being a 'lesser' Mass. Other people totally reject all Novus Ordo Masses and will only go to Tridentine Masses.
Currently, (as far as I understand the regulations), a Priest must get permission from his Bishop if he wants to celebrate a Tridentine Mass. There are a couple of places in England where Mass is celebrated in this way.
As for me, I have only been to a Tridentine Mass a small handful of times in my life, as I don't really have any local opportunity to go.
I do have the option of going to a Novus Ordo Mass in Latin, but I don't go to that one regularly.
I am not well-versed in any indepth arguments between the Tridentine & Novus Ordo Masses, as I don't have any close Catholic friends who are (so-called) "Traddies" , and so the opportunity to discuss this has not arisen.
I am reluctant to accept an argument that the Tridentine Mass is somehow intrinsically 'more holy' than a Novus Ordo Mass or that one gets more graces simply from going to a Tridentine Mass (which some people seem to imply).
Afterall, the Tridentine Mass came about through a Church Council, and so did the Novus Ordo Mass.
However, I can see the argument that the Tridentine Mass may foster a greater sense of awe and reverence during Mass, making it easier to truely enter into the mystery of the Mass.
I appreciate the silence (sometimes having all that music can prevent you from doing any thinking & praying), and the outstanding respect and reverence with which Mass is said certaintly does encourage a greater respect for the holiness of the Eucharist.
I myself have been to some pretty awful Novus Ordo Masses. Not so much in England, but one I went to in America filled me with horror; it was just so irreverant I almost cried; 15-20 Eucharistic Ministers with a mean age of 16 who had no idea what they were doing, parading all over the Church holding chalices filled with the blood of Christ and ciboria full of hosts, all dressed in mini-shorts...*shudders*. eugh.
and you read all sorts of things on the interent about bad things going on in Novus Ordo Masses in America; things like Priests forbidding Parishoners from kneeling, or forbidding them from recieving communion on the tongue, lay people reading the Gospel & giving the homily, people being encouraged to crowd round the altar during the most holy Consecration etc etc...
Things like that would *NEVER* happen in any Tridentine Mass...
But, I can't help thinking that this is because the Tridentine Mass is not the 'default' Mass, and so when people go to a Tridentine Mass they are aware that it is 'different', and so put more effort (the Priest & the people) into making it more reverant and respectful, than your average Sunday Mass in your average Parish.
That is, some may argue that there is nothing really intrinsic to the Tridentine Mass that stops such abuse and irreverance happening. It's just that the people who currently attend & the Priests who celebrate the Tridentine Mass now-a-days, are the sort of people who wouldn't do that anyway.
That is, your sample is biased!
If every Catholic Church in the world were to celebrate only the Tridentine Mass, your 'liturgical abuses per Tridentine Mass' ratio would probably rise.
I once heard a Priest, who was celebrating his 50th anniversary as a Priest, say that it is incorrect to assume that back in the old Pre-Vatican 2 days, every Tridentine Mass was holy and reverant, and every parishoner was God-fearing and obedient to the Church.
He said Masses said back then were just as likely to be sloppy and rushed, and have corners cut, as any Novus Ordo Mass is these days, and many people went to Mass because of social pressures, and not really driven by any love of God.
So I don't know whether if the Tridentine Mass became 'the norm' now-a-days, said in every Parish everywhere round the world, the standards currently seen in Tridentine Masses would persist.
Somehow, I think not. (But I could be wrong)
Some people say that the Novus Ordo Mass gives more scope for liturgical abuse, and irreverent activities, and I can definitly see their arguments and this may be true to a certain extent.
However, for me, a vitally important factor is what goes on in someone's heart, and the respect and love they have for Christ; having a loving relationship with Christ, at whose death we are present during Mass , and having a living faith in the Eucharist and the Church, is of central importance.
Some people would argue that the beauty of a Tridentine Mass would feed that more than a typical Novus Ordo Mass, but, as I said, I don't know how long that would hold up for if the Tridentine Mass were to become the norm.
I think that proper catechesis and instruction on the faith is sorely needed, and when that improves, and people's faith & love increases, so will their respect for the Mass.
I've only ever had one close friend who frequented the Tridentine Mass.
But you know the sadest part?
If he couldn't get to his Tridentine Mass...he would just skip Mass that Sunday.
He would break his Sunday obligation rather than going to a Novus Ordo Mass.
That makes me very sad, and I think is an example of how sometimes this argument about Tridentine Mass/Novus Ordo Mass can lose its perspective; it becomes all about 'the type of Mass', and actually forgetting about Jesus and His commandments to love God and our neighbour.
I have been to some very beautiful and respectful Novus Ordo Masses, so I don't think there are any intrinsic flaws in the Novus Ordo Mass...the abuses are more likely to be due to a lack of respect and faith of the people involved..and so perhaps they would happen anyway, even if the Tridentine Mass was the standard Mass.
But anyway, I do think that the Tridentine Mass is a very beautiful Mass (with the way it is celebrated now-a-days it unarguably is); would I go only to a Tridentine Mass if there was one every Sunday in my home town?
I don't know.
Would getting rid of the Novus Ordo Mass and having only the Tridentine Mass solve the World's faith crisis...I don't know.
I am a strong believer in the fact that the Holy Spirit is guiding the Catholic Church, and I'm sure, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if the Novus Ordo Mass was brought in, it was for a good reason.
On a related note, there are rumours in the Catholic world that Pope Benedict will, in the not too distant future, bring in permission to allow the Tridentine Mass to be said by any Priest if they want to.
~~~
Anyway, please, if I have said anything incorrect then please do correct me! I am certainly no expert in this area and these are just my simple thoughts!
I would be very interested to hear what anyone else thinks on this issue! I know a lot of people in blog world are very pro-Tridentine Mass, and almost anti-Novus Ordo Mass (especially if it's in the venacular!), but I haven't ever been clear why.
and to Jane who asked me the question...what do you think?
God Bless
-x-
-----

10 comments:
Because there is no "joining in" with the responses, you are left to pray in your own way in the Old Rite. You can follow in a missal, or pray the rosary, pray from a prayer book (ever wonder why those prayers by the saints designed to be "before communion" were so long?) or just pray in your own words. The priest is praying on behalf of the people and his focus is on God. Everyone faces the same way. There is no room for liturgical abuse because the rubrics are very very firmly stated: this is how it's done. Every move of priest and servers is scripted: the original liturgical dance, if you like!!
So the Old Rite Mass is intrinsically reverent.
However, a Novus Ordo Mass can be just as reverent, if the priest and servers approach it in the correct way. If the Mass is celebrated ad orientem then the emphasis is again on God, and not on the priest. The rubrics do leave a lot more "choices" for the priest but it is still possible for it to be done well.
The problem is that, with so many choices being stated as "in these or similar" there is much more opportunity for the personality of the priest to be made manifest, and it becomes a sort of "look at me folks!" approach.
You have to keep getting up and sitting down and kneeling. Then there are the responses which have to be made by everyone...
Please don't get me wrong. I love the Novus Ordo Mass when it is carried out with reverence and love. It is just as much the Mass as the Old Rite. I just feel that there is room for both.
Thanks so much for so many thought-provoking comments Mac!
I totally know what you mean about the risk of Mass becoming all about the Priest.
It was like that when I went to Mass in America; Mass was basically like a show, with the Priest as the main character 'entertaining' the congregation.
and I really do like the fact that the Priest faces in the same way as the people in the Tridentine Mass.
God Bless
xxx
your blog is very thought prevoking. I, too, am Catholic. I hold my faith in high esteem and have found myself speaking out more when I see it being dashed. This is highly interesting to me and I hope to continue to come back and read more of your thoughts and share them with my friends and family.
I am a Traditionalist. Seeing the priest facing East, facing the direction where Christ will come from again in glory, I am filled with awe. In the Tridentine Mass, I am filled with wonder and awe concerning the mystery and reverence of the Latin prayers, use of incense (which NEVER happens in my Novus Ordo), Communion while kneeling, and the many many more prayers said in the Mass by the priest. I love the Tridentine Mass, which I do find superior to the vast majority of Novus Ordo liturgies here in the USA. Have you ever heard of the Neocatechumenal Way? Those are the people that crowd around the altar and are known for liturgical abuses.
Hey moneybags,
Yes, I agree, communion while kneeling is a very beautiful custom.
I have seen it done in one or two parishes with Novus Ordo masses.
No incence? Oh dear, that is a shame.
Basically every Sunday Mass I have ever been to in England has incence (Novus Ordo).
Perhaps it's more an American thing not to have incence..?
Thanks so much for your comments!
God Bless
xxx
Antonia,
This incredible DVD set will answer many of your questions about the Tridentine Mass. It is an incredible set!! The music is incredible, Father's commentary is incredible, the Mass is Awesome!!
http://www.thefirstmass.com/
(My computer disconnected right as I was trying to post this comment so I hope you are not getting it twice.)
Hi Therese,
thanks for that link. I will look at it now!
God Bless
xxx
It is not quite true that Tridentine rite and the Novus Ordo were both created by Church councils. The Novus Ordo, as far as I am aware is the only liturgy to have been invented de novo with a complete break from tradition. Pius V codified any rite that had been in use for greater than 200 years and made one of them, the Tridentine rite, the normative rite of the Church. The Tridentine rite was not invented at the Council of Trent, but rather has been in a process of continual organic development probably since at least the fourth century AD. The Novus Ordo on the other hand is a rite manufactured by liturgical committees, quite unlike any other rite in the history of the Church. For more on this, read Alcuin Reid's book "The Organic Development of the Liturgy".
Hello Antonia.
Thank you for your in-depth reply, it was interesting to read your thoughts on the matter.
I think the situation regarding the Traditional Latin Mass is quite unstable, which is the underlying message I read through your response to my question. For me it’s a feeling of ‘them’ and ‘us’ regarding those who prefer to attend the Latin and those who stay with the English. That creates a division which I believe would be better handled if all priests were allowed to celebrate Latin if it was in demand, rather than have to receive special permission (and therefore making it seem secretive?). Perhaps I find the Latin more holy and reverent because I wasn’t brought up with it, so there is a crude sense of novelty I suppose. Also the fact that lay people are more actively involved with celebrating the English Mass in a physical sense, ie readings, Communion in the hand, Offertory etc, does make it seem more ‘low key’ for want of a better phrase. Maybe I’m reading too much into this?! I definitely think that parishioners shouldn’t be allowed to put hosts (even if they are unconsecrated) into a communion bowl before the start of Mass as they come in. This is something I have unfortunately encountered at one church.
Also, maybe this is too political – but in some more relaxed English Masses there are girls serving on the alter with boys – I think that is uncalled for as the girls will get the wrong idea of what is expected of them and what they can achieve. If only boys are allowed to become Priests then girls who show an interest in the church should be told more about other religious vocations. I attended one Mass where they were a couple of girls aged around 9 or 10 who fiddled with their clothing and gossiped throughout the service. I feel as if in some English Masses there is a lack of respect and too much liberal interpretation of the Church’s teachings, which simply couldn’t take place during the Latin. So I think that in a nutshell is maybe why I prefer the latter! What do you think?
So if you find out any information about what the Pope intends to do regarding letting all Priests say the Latin if it is desired, then please put it on your blog!
Happy Easter
Jane.
Post a Comment